by Andrea Bonavita
_b_sml%20(2).jpg)
American prisons hold a population grown up seven
times in the last 35 years (up to 2.4 million people). Even the number of
recidivists remains extremely high: the 60% of those who paid their debt to
society find themselves returning in prison within three years. As shown by the
author, at first we could think that having jails full of offenders is the
warranty of low rates of crime; however, criminologists haven’t found yet a
direct connection between people behind bars and levels of crime. On the other
hand and despite of its name, the “correction” system doesn’t seem able to offer
to the inmates a true reintegration into society.
Prison and society seem to be worlds related one
another just for necessity, not with effective interaction. From the point of
view of the Law, punishment works: it is the justifiable compensation from the
offense caused to a member of a certain society. From the point of view of the
human community, if punishment can redress an injustice, in itself it doesn’t help
to mend the break between the culprit and the society that condemned him.
Where alternatives to prison has been tried,
the outcomes have been good. The author cites the case of states that created mandating
drug treatments for non-violent offenders (Texas, Kansas) or adopted periods of
probation (Hawaii). The UCLA has been working on an important project that wants
to encourage inmates at the end of their punishment to re-enter the society providing
apartments and GPS bracelets. The aim of all these solutions is the increasing of
the responsibility of the prisoners to make them more ready to re-enter into
society.
If we consider the prison as the final stage of
the process of Justice (imputation, trial, judgment), the process of reintegration
covers the opposite way to rebuild the original situation. In this perspective,
punishment is just the beginning of a long process that must have the society
as its goal. One could have the opinion that locking people up and throw them
away forever can be the best solution (it is the opinion against which the
former Texas Governor cited in the article struggled when he was in charge).
However, this implies the belief in a society in which there is an ‘inside’ and
an ‘outside’: a very questionable position. The human community is one, without
any kind of ‘outside’, and it is even composed by those members who have decided,
willingly or not, to act sometimes against the community.
The development of re-entry processes seems to
be an effective way for the good of the whole society and for the future of
every offender.
I love that you pointed out that the "correction" system isn't correcting :)
ReplyDelete